Analysis of Electrical Conductivity and Compression Properties of Hard Carbon and Graphite Materials

1. Background

With the rapid development of the new energy industry, the market demand for lithium-ion batteries is also increasing. Due to the raw material resource limitations and cost issues of lithium-ion batteries, sodium-ion batteries have also gradually received the attention of many researchers. Among them, graphite anode, which is most commonly used in lithium-ion batteries, when used in sodium-ion batteries, is difficult to embed sodium ions between graphite layers due to thermodynamic reasons, and it is not easy to form stable intercalation compounds with carbon, so it is difficult to use graphite as an anode material for sodium-ion batteries.¹ The amorphous hard carbon material has a very good performance of sodium storage (specific capacity of 300 mAh/g) and a low sodium storage potential (plateau voltage of 0.1 V or so), it is currently the most promising anode material for sodium-ion batteries. In addition to the well-known differences in structure, morphology and electrochemical profiles between graphite and hard carbon materials, how much difference is there in the conductivity and compacted density of the powders as well as the rebound properties? In this paper, two commonly used graphite and hard carbon powders are each selected to compare the differences in electrical conductivity and compaction density and rebound properties of the two types of materials, and to gain a deeper understanding of the properties of these two materials.

 

Figure 1. structural differences between graphite, hard and soft carbon

Figure 1. structural differences between graphite, hard and soft carbon2

2. Test Method

2.1 Test Equipment: PRCD3100 is used for two kinds of graphite and two kinds of hard carbon powder. The equipment is as shown in Figure 2.

PRCD3100 PRCD3100 structure diagram

Figure 2. (a)PRCD3100 appearance diagram; (b)PRCD3100 structure diagram

2.2 Test Parameters: Apply a pressure range of 5-200MPa, with 20MPa interval, and pressure holding for 10s.

3.Test Results

The conductivity and compaction density test curves of the four graphite and hard carbon materials are shown in Figure 3. From the result curves, the conductivity and compaction density of the two graphite materials are significantly greater than those of the two hard carbon materials. Different graphite materials also differ in conductivity due to their graphitization degree or structural morphology.

Figure 3(a) Electrical conductivity and compaction density curves of the four graphite and hard carbon materials.Figure 3(b) Electrical conductivity and compaction density curves of the four graphite and hard carbon materials. Figure 3. Electrical conductivity and compaction density curves of the four graphite and hard carbon materials.

Test the pressure pressure and pressure relief of the four materials, load the pressure according to the pressure change curve as shown in Figure 4 (a), and adjust the corresponding material thickness change and the thickness rebound curve as shown in Figure 4 (a) and (b). When four powders of the same quality are taken for the compression test, the absolute thickness value of the hard carbon material and the change of the thickness rebound are greater than that of the graphite material.When the graphite material is at about 50MPa, the thickness rebound amount is relatively stable, while when the hard carbon material is above 50MPa, the thickness rebound amount is still gradually increasing. Using the maximum pressure relief, get the stress strain curve of Figure 4 (d), by analyzing the maximum shape variable, reversible shape variable and irreversible shape variable, as shown in Table 1, the reversible deformation of hard carbon material is greater than the graphite material, and from the perspective of the slope of the stress strain curve, the compression modulus of graphite material is less than the hard carbon material.The above results show that graphite materials can achieve a higher compaction density than hard carbon materials.

Analysis of Electrical Conductivity and Compression Properties of Hard Carbon and Graphite Materials

Figure 4(b) Stress-strain curves during pressurization and depressurization of four materials Figure 4(c) Stress-strain curves during pressurization and depressurization of four materials  Figure 4(d) Stress-strain curves during pressurization and depressurization of four materials

Figure 4. Stress-strain curves during pressurization and depressurization of four materials

 

Table 1.Summary of morphometric data for the four materials

Table 1.Summary of morphometric data for the four materials

 

According to the above test results, the electrical conductivity of graphite is better than hard carbon, and the compression performance of the particle layer is better than hard carbon.The reasons for the structural differences between hard carbon and graphite, are shown in Figures 5 and 6.Graphite is a lamelayer structure, each layer of carbon into a planar hexagonal structure, a carbon atom around three carbon-carbon single bonds, and carbon atoms outer layer has four valence electrons, graphite each carbon atoms left a valence electron unbonded, between the lamina by van der Waals forces. When energized, these unbonded valence electrons will move directionally in the layer to form a current current, so the graphite electrical conductivity is better. However, due to the existence of molecular crosslinking and covalent C-O-C bonds in their precursor, hard carbon materials are more likely to form a rigid crosslinking structure in the process of pyrolysis, and produce a large number of defects, micropores and oxygen-bearing functional groups. These structures in the carbonization stage will inhibit graphite growth and orientation stacking, and form a large number of random distribution of curved graphite, even at 2500℃ and higher temperature, materials will not form graphite, can only form a short-range order, long-range disorder of graphite microcrystal structure, this structure hindered the directional movement of the electron, so the conductivity of hard carbon material is lower.In the process of material compression, the powder particles are first under pressure to shift the pores between the particles, the particle contact area increases, and the conductivity and compaction density increase accordingly.As the pressure increases further, the particles completely contact each other, most of the pores between the particles are filled, and the deformation resistance increases.The pressure continues to increase, making the particles to recoverable elastic strain, and the compaction density of graphite is close to the material authentic density of 2.3g / cm3And hard carbon inside a large number of microholes, under 200MP a pressure almost cannot be filled completely, so hard carbon compaction density is lower than graphite, but the hard carbon disorder is higher, the microstructure of carbon layer stacking and cross-link interaction, make its elasticity should change big, so the thickness of the hard carbon rebound after pressure discharge is bigger.

Figure 5. Figure 5.Formation and microstructure of graphite, hard and soft carbon materials

 

Figure 5. Formation and microstructure of graphite, hard carbon and soft carbon materials2

Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the structural analysis of the hard-carbon materials

 

Figure 6. Schematic diagram of the structural analysis of the hard-carbon materials2

4. Summarize

In this paper, PRCD3100 tested the conductivity, compaction density and rebound properties of graphite and hard carbon powders, and found that the electrical conductivity of graphite is greater than that of hard carbon, and the compression performance of the particle level is greater than that of hard carbon, which is mainly related to the microstructure of the two materials. When both are used in batteries of different systems, in addition to electrical conductivity and compressibility, but also to consider their sodium storage or lithium storage performance.

 

5. References

[1] Hu Yongsheng,Lu Jiaxiang,Chen Liquan,etc.,Sodium Ion Battery Science and Technology, Science Press,2020,134-137.

[2] Lijing Xie, Cheng Tang, Zhihong Bi,et al.Hard Carbon Anodes for Next-Generation Li-Ion Batteries: Review and Perspective.Adv.Energy Mater.2021, 2101650.

Subscribe Us

Contact Us

If you are interested in our products and want to know more details, please leave a message here, we will reply you as soon as we can.

Contact Us

Please fill out the form below and we will contact you asap!

IEST Wechat QR code