Rational Design of a Li-Rich Hybrid Cathode with a 3D Interstitial Network for Reversible Oxygen Redox
Abstract
📄 Source Paper
First Author: Jianan Hao · Corresponding Authors: Dr. Jinyang Dong, Prof. Yuefeng Su, Assoc. Prof. Lai Chen
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2026.105121
| Journal: Energy Storage Materials, 2026, 88, 105121
| Affiliations: School of Materials Science and Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology; BIT Chongqing Innovation Center; China Electric Power Research Institute; Beijing Institute of Technology, Zhuhai Campus
✓ IEST Instrument acknowledged — IEST Powder Resistivity & Compaction Density Tester (PRCD1100) used in this research
1. Research Background
Li-rich manganese-based layered oxide cathodes (LRM/LMNO) are considered one of the most promising candidates for next-generation high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries, owing to their high specific capacity and low cost. However, LRM materials face multiple challenges in practical application: the characteristic Li-O-Li configuration that enables anionic redox activity also drives irreversible oxygen release, causing first-cycle capacity loss; during deep delithiation, transition metals readily migrate from octahedral sites in the layered structure into tetrahedral sites within the lithium layer, triggering irreversible transformation of the layered phase into spinel or rock-salt phases; oxygen loss further reduces transition-metal valence states, causing continuous voltage decay; and the inherently low ionic conductivity and sluggish oxygen-anion redox kinetics of the Li₂MnO₃ component severely constrain rate performance.
Conventional modification strategies — doping, surface coating, heterostructure design, and crystal-facet engineering — offer some improvement but often require complex precursors and cumbersome processing. More importantly, single-material modification struggles to simultaneously resolve structural instability, ion-transport kinetics, interfacial side reactions, and low compaction density together. Developing electrode-level synergistic design strategies — achieving performance complementarity through physical coupling of different material systems — therefore carries significant scientific and engineering value.
2. Article Overview
Prof. Yuefeng Su, Assoc. Prof. Lai Chen, and Dr. Jinyang Dong’s team at Beijing Institute of Technology have proposed an electrode-level physical blending design strategy: physically mixing micron-scale Li-rich layered oxide cathode (LMNO) with nanoscale, rigid Ni-based disordered rock-salt cathode material (DRX), followed by low-temperature heat treatment, successfully constructing a hybrid cathode (LMDR) with a 3D interstitial network for cathode materials.
In this design, LMNO functions as the structural “pillar” that provides the primary capacity contribution and layered diffusion scaffold, while the additionally introduced DRX particles embed uniformly within the inter-particle gaps of LMNO, forming a percolating network that simultaneously enhances ion/electron transport and redistributes mechanical stress. This spatial synergistic coupling effectively regulates the local chemical and mechanical environment, enabling reversible oxygen redox, suppressing oxygen release and transition-metal dissolution, and mitigating stress accumulation during cycling.
The optimized LMDR-10 cathode demonstrates superior initial Coulombic efficiency, enhanced cycling stability, reduced voltage decay, and excellent rate performance. This work, titled “Rational Design of Li-Rich Hybrid Cathodes with Stiff Redox-Active Interstitial Networks Enabling Local Environment Engineering for Reversible Oxygen Redox,” was published in Energy Storage Materials (2026, 88, 105121).
3. Article Highlights
3.1 Structure, Morphology, Compaction Density, and Conductivity

Figure 1. LMDR structure, morphology, and compaction density/conductivity test results.
Results show that construction of the LMDR rigid network does not alter the phase composition or lattice parameters of the individual components, and LMDR-10 achieves uniform distribution of all constituents. Compaction density and powder resistance testing show that LMDR effectively increases electrode density while reducing overall resistance — a direct benefit for volumetric energy density and rate capability in the finished cell. The material’s compaction density and powder resistance were tested using the Powder Resistivity & Compaction Density Tester (PRCD1100) from IEST Instrument.

Figure 2. Official acknowledgments excerpt from Energy Storage Materials (2026) — Beijing Institute of Technology research team acknowledges IEST Instrument‘s support for compaction density and conductivity testing.
3.2 Electrochemical Performance

Figure 3. (a) The cycling performance of all samples at 1 C between 2.0–4.6 V; The dQ/dV curves during discharging process of LMNO, LMDR-5, LMDR-10, and LMDR-15; GITT curves and the calculated Li+ diffusion coefficients of LMNO, LMDR-5, LMDR-10, and LMDR-15; (j) Average discharge voltage profiles of all samples at 1 C between 2.0–4.6 V; (k) Rate performance of all samples.
Electrochemical testing results show that after 300 cycles at 1C, LMDR-10 exhibits improved capacity retention and reduced voltage decay relative to pristine LMNO. dQ/dV analysis indicates that LMDR-10 effectively suppresses the irreversible transformation of the layered phase into the spinel phase. GITT testing confirms that LMDR-10 increases the lithium-ion diffusion coefficient. LMDR-10 also shows improved rate capability across increasing current densities.
3.3 Oxygen Redox Behavior: DEMS, In-Situ EIS, and Soft X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy

Figure 4. DEMS of O₂ and CO₂ of LMNO and LMDR-10; In situ EIS of LMNO and LMDR-10 during charging process; (e) The fitting results of R_ct and R_s during charging process; Normalized soft XAS spectra at selected voltage during the initial and second cycle of O K-edge of LMNO and LMDR-10; (h) Intensity ratio of OKL/OKH from the actual test results.
DEMS (differential electrochemical mass spectrometry) shows that oxygen redox reversibility is improved in LMDR-10. In-situ EIS reveals that interfacial side reactions are effectively suppressed in LMDR-10. O K-edge soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis shows that the TM-O framework structural stability is enhanced in LMDR-10. Together, these results confirm that the LMDR design achieves a stabilized surface structure and regulated anionic redox activity, thereby improving overall electrochemical stability.
3.4 Multiscale Post-Cycling Characterization

Figure 5. Nyquist plots of different samples at initial cycle and 100th cycle; Raman spectra after 100 cycles of LMNO, LMDR-5, LMDR-10, and LMDR-15; Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images showing DMT modulus of LMNO and LMDR-10 after cycling; XPS spectra after 100 cycles of O 1 s in LMNO and LMDR-10; Contour plots of the Mn K-edge WT-EXAFS spectra of cycled LMNO and LMDR-10.
Multiscale characterization of cycled electrodes provides further insight into LMDR-10’s advantages: phase transformation in LMDR-10 is significantly suppressed, stress distribution is more uniform, lattice oxygen signal intensity is higher after cycling, and Mn-O and Mn-Mn bond strengths are higher relative to pristine LMNO. Laboratory-scale thick-electrode testing further confirms that LMDR’s advantages persist even at higher areal loading — an important indicator for practical cell-level scale-up.
3.5 COMSOL Simulation: Li-Ion Concentration and Stress Distribution

Figure 6. (a) Simulation diagram of Li-ion concentration distribution for LMNO and LMDR; (b) Simulation diagram of stress distribution for LMNO and LMDR.
COMSOL simulation further demonstrates that the LMDR rigid network produces more uniform lithium-ion concentration and mechanical stress distribution during charge-discharge cycling — significantly mitigating particle microcrack formation and electrode cracking.
LMDR-10 vs Pristine LMNO: Key Performance Metrics
| Parameter | Pristine LMNO | LMDR-10 (Hybrid with DRX) |
|---|---|---|
| Compaction density | Baseline | Increased |
| Powder resistance | Baseline | Reduced |
| Capacity retention (300 cyc, 1C) | Lower | Improved |
| Voltage decay | Higher | Reduced |
| Layered-to-spinel transformation | More pronounced | Suppressed |
| Li+ diffusion coefficient (GITT) | Lower | Increased |
| Rate capability | Lower | Improved |
| Oxygen redox reversibility (DEMS) | Lower | Improved |
| Interfacial side reactions (in-situ EIS) | More pronounced | Suppressed |
| Post-cycling particle microcracking | More pronounced | Mitigated |
| Thick-electrode performance | Degrades faster | Advantage retained at higher loading |
4. Conclusion
This work, through an electrode-level design strategy, successfully integrates micron-scale Li-rich manganese-based layered oxide cathode with nanoscale rigid disordered rock-salt cathode material in a synergistic manner, constructing a cathode material (LMDR) built around a 3D interstitial network for cathode materials. The resulting LMDR-10 demonstrates multiple advantages: high initial Coulombic efficiency, excellent long-term cycling stability, significantly suppressed voltage decay, and outstanding rate performance.
This work offers mechanistic insight into how inter-particle phase coupling and local environment engineering can synergistically stabilize redox chemistry in Li-rich layered oxides, providing a scalable electrode-design paradigm for developing high-energy-density, long-life Li-rich cathode materials.
5. Original Article
Jianan Hao, et al. Rational Design of Li-Rich Hybrid Cathodes with Stiff Redox-Active Interstitial Networks Enabling Local Environment Engineering for Reversible Oxygen Redox. Energy Storage Materials, 2026, 88, 105121.
6. FAQs
6.1 What is a Li-rich manganese-based layered oxide cathode and why is it difficult to commercialize?
A Li-rich manganese-based layered oxide cathode (LRM/LMNO) is a high-capacity, low-cost cathode material considered a leading candidate for next-generation high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries. Its characteristic Li-O-Li local configuration enables anionic (oxygen) redox activity that boosts specific capacity beyond conventional transition-metal-only redox. However, this same structural feature drives irreversible oxygen release during early cycling, causing first-cycle capacity loss. Deep delithiation also promotes transition-metal migration from layered octahedral sites into tetrahedral sites in the lithium layer, triggering irreversible transformation toward spinel or rock-salt phases — which, combined with oxygen-loss-driven transition-metal valence reduction, causes continuous voltage decay and severely limits rate capability due to the low ionic conductivity of the Li₂MnO₃ component.
6.2 What is a 3D interstitial network for cathode materials and how does it stabilize Li-rich cathodes?
A 3D interstitial network for cathode materials, as demonstrated in the LMDR hybrid cathode design, is formed by physically embedding nanoscale rigid particles — in this case, a Ni-based disordered rock-salt (DRX) cathode material — uniformly within the inter-particle gaps of a micron-scale layered cathode host (LMNO). This creates a percolating three-dimensional network that provides additional ion and electron transport pathways beyond the host material’s own diffusion channels, while also mechanically redistributing stress across the electrode during cycling. By regulating both the local chemical environment (suppressing oxygen release and transition-metal dissolution) and the local mechanical environment (reducing stress concentration and microcrack formation), this interstitial network stabilizes redox chemistry without requiring complex doping or coating chemistry.
6.3 Why is a Ni-based disordered rock-salt cathode used as the rigid interstitial component instead of a coating or dopant?
A Ni-based disordered rock-salt cathode (DRX) was selected as a nanoscale, rigid, redox-active particle rather than an inert coating or a simple dopant because it serves multiple simultaneous functions that single-material modification approaches cannot achieve together. As a physically distinct, mechanically stiff particle, it structurally supports the softer layered LMNO framework and redistributes mechanical stress during lithiation/delithiation. Because it is itself redox-active and disordered rock-salt materials are known for reasonable ionic conductivity despite their disordered cation arrangement, it also contributes meaningfully to ion/electron transport rather than acting as dead weight. This combination — mechanical reinforcement plus functional redox and transport contribution — is difficult to achieve with a conventional surface coating or lattice dopant, which typically address only one failure mode (interfacial stability or bulk doping effects) rather than the coupled mechanical-chemical degradation pathways in Li-rich cathodes.
6.4 How does compaction density testing validate the LMDR hybrid cathode design?
Compaction density testing directly validates whether physically blending nanoscale DRX particles into the LMNO host actually improves electrode-level packing efficiency, rather than simply diluting capacity with an inactive filler. In this study, compaction density and powder resistance were measured using the IEST PRCD1100 Powder Resistivity & Compaction Density Tester, showing that the LMDR hybrid effectively increases electrode density while simultaneously reducing overall powder resistance — a combination that directly benefits volumetric energy density (through higher active material packing per unit electrode volume) and rate capability (through lower electronic resistance) in the finished cell. This measurement is essential because a design that improved cycling stability but reduced compaction density would trade one performance metric for another rather than achieving genuine, scalable improvement.
6.5 Does the LMDR hybrid cathode design work in thick electrodes, or only in thin laboratory coin cells?
This study specifically tested laboratory-scale thick-electrode configurations at higher areal loading — a critical validation step, since many cathode modification strategies that work well in thin, low-loading coin cells fail to translate to the higher loadings required for practical, energy-dense cell formats. The results confirmed that LMDR’s advantages persist even at higher areal loading, suggesting the 3D interstitial network design is not merely a thin-electrode artifact but provides genuine mechanical and transport benefits that scale toward more industrially relevant electrode configurations. This is an important signal for the design’s potential scalability, though further validation at full pouch-cell or cylindrical-cell format would be the next logical step toward commercial application.
Subscribe Us
Contact Us
If you are interested in our products and want to know more details, please leave a message here, we will reply you as soon as we can.


