Advanced Energy Materials 2024: IEST In‑Situ Gas Evolution Solution Quantifies Thermal Stability of High‑Safety Solid Polymer Electrolytes

Table of Contents

IEST GVM2200 in-situ gas and volume monitoring system schematic — integrating high-precision mechanical testing, dedicated software, multi-function test chamber with auxiliary systems, charge/discharge tester with three-electrode monitoring, and cyclic temperature control — used to quantify thermal-induced gas evolution and swelling behavior of solid polymer electrolyte pouch cells in high-voltage lithium metal batteries.

Abstract

Solid polymer electrolyte refers to a solvent‑free or low‑solvent polymeric membrane that conducts lithium ions through segmental motion of polymer chains and typically requires a lithium salt and sometimes a plasticizing agent such as a deep eutectic solvent to achieve practical ionic conductivity. A key question in high‑voltage lithium metal batteries is whether solid polymer electrolytes can effectively suppress thermal‑induced gas generation and swelling compared to conventional liquid electrolytes. To address this, Xiamen & Zhejiang University research team used the IEST GVM2200 in‑situ gas and volume monitor found that DES‑ETPTA solid polymer electrolyte maintained near‑constant volume during high‑temperature exposure, while liquid‑electrolyte cells showed progressive expansion from gas release. This direct quantitative evidence confirms that the solid polymer electrolyte suppresses thermal decomposition and gas evolution, providing a measurable safety advantage.

📄 Source Paper

Chengkun Zhang, Hongfei Zheng, Liang Lin, Jiansen Wen, Shiyu Zhang, Xinchao Hu, Dongwei Zhou, Baisheng Sa, Laisen Wang, Jie Lin, Qingshui Xie, Dong-Liang Peng, Jun Lu


Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Solid Polymer Electrolytes for High-Voltage and High-Safety Lithium Metal Batteries.

DOI: doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202401324
| Journal: Advanced Energy Materials 2024, 14, 2401324
| Institutions: Xiamen University, Zhejiang University

✓ IEST In-Situ Battery Gassing Volume Analyzer used in this research

1. Preface

In 2024, a research team led by Professors Dong-Liang Peng and Qingshui Xie at Xiamen University, in collaboration with Professor Jun Lu’s group from Zhejiang University, published a study in Advanced Energy Materials titled “Deep Eutectic Solvent-Based Solid Polymer Electrolytes for High-Voltage and High-Safety Lithium Metal Batteries.” This study addressed the critical challenges facing high-voltage lithium metal batteries, including electrolyte flammability, unstable electrode/electrolyte interfaces, and limited ion transport, by developing a solid polymer electrolyte system based on deep eutectic solvents (DES). By encapsulating a succinonitrile-based DES in situ within an ETPTA polymer network, the researchers constructed a DES-ETPTA solid polymer electrolyte that combines high ionic conductivity, stable interfacial compatibility with lithium metal, and excellent flame retardancy. Cyanoacrylate copolymerization was also introduced to enhance the electrolyte’s oxidative stability in high-voltage LiCoO₂ cathode systems.

Notably, during the thermal-safety evaluation, the research team employed the IEST GVM2200 in-situ gas and volume monitor to continuously monitor pouch cell volume changes under high-temperature conditions. The resulting volume-time data provided quantitative evidence for evaluating thermally induced gassing and swelling in cells containing the DES-ETPTA electrolyte relative to cells containing a conventional liquid electrolyte.

2. Research Background: Why In-Situ Gas Evolution Monitoring Matters for Solid Polymer Electrolytes

Lithium metal anode has an exceptionally high theoretical specific capacity of approximately 3,860 mAh g⁻¹ and a highly negative electrochemical potential of −3.04 V vs. the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE), making it a leading candidate for next-generation high-energy-density batteries. However, conventional liquid electrolytes can present safety concerns because of their flammability and susceptibility to decomposition at high temperatures. Gas evolution during thermal abuse or extended cycling can cause pouch cell swelling and internal pressure build-up, potentially increasing safety risks.

Solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs) represent a promising pathway to address these safety concerns by reducing the use of flammable liquid electrolytes and providing mechanically and thermally stable electrolyte structures. However, these properties depend on the electrolyte composition and polymer architecture. Determining whether and to what degree a specific SPE reduces thermally induced gas evolution requires more than flammability tests or post-mortem cell disassembly.

Visual inspection can indicate whether pronounced pouch-cell swelling has occurred, but it cannot determine the onset of gassing-related volume change, the rate of volume increase, or the total volume change during a test. Without continuous quantitative data, comparisons of thermal behavior among electrolyte systems remain largely qualitative. In-situ volume monitoring addresses this limitation by providing time-resolved volume-change profiles under controlled test conditions.

3. The DES-ETPTA Solid Polymer Electrolyte: Design and Key Properties

The research team designed the DES-ETPTA solid polymer electrolyte by encapsulating a succinonitrile (SN)-based deep eutectic solvent (DES) in situ within an ethoxylated trimethylolpropane triacrylate (ETPTA) polymer network. This dual-component architecture was designed to address the three major limitations of conventional solid polymer electrolyte systems: low ionic conductivity, unstable electrode/electrolyte interfaces, and limited electrochemical stability.

Deep eutectic solvent (DES) is a mixture of two or more components whose interactions produce a melting point substantially lower than those of the individual components. In battery electrolyte applications, DES systems can offer high ionic conductivity, low volatility, and reduced flammability compared with conventional organic carbonate electrolytes.

DES-ETPTA solid polymer electrolyte developed in this study consists of an SN-based DES encapsulated in situ within an ETPTA polymer matrix. The DES phase facilitates lithium-ion transport, while the polymer network provides structural integrity and supports interfacial contact with the electrodes. This architecture combines the following properties:

  • High ionic conductivity: The DES phase facilitates ionic transport within the ETPTA polymer matrix, supporting room-temperature operation.
  • Lithium-metal interface compatibility: The polymer was designed to support stable interfacial contact with lithium metal during repeated plating and stripping.
  • Flame retardancy: Incorporation of the non-flammable DES reduces reliance on flammable carbonate-based liquid electrolytes and can help lower electrolyte combustion risk.

To extend the DES-ETPTA electrolyte’s operational voltage window for compatibility with high-voltage LiCoO₂ cathodes (charging to 4.5 V vs. Li/Li⁺), the team incorporated cyanoacrylate copolymerization modification, improving the electrolyte’s oxidative stability at the cathode interface and enabling stable high-voltage LiCoO₂ solid-state battery cycling.

Schematic of in-situ polymerization constructing DES-ETPTA solid polymer electrolyte interface in high-voltage lithium metal battery

Figure 1. In-situ polymerization of the DES-ETPTA electrolyte to form stable electrode/electrolyte interfaces for long-term cycling of high-voltage lithium metal battery.

4. How IEST GVM2200 In-Situ Gas Evolution Monitoring Provided the Key Evidence

The thermal stability validation phase of the study posed a challenge that conventional characterization methods could not fully resolve. To evaluate the impact of electrolyte chemistry on high-temperature behavior, the research team assembled pouch cells containing either conventional liquid electrolyte or the DES-ETPTA solid polymer electrolyte, and exposed them to the same high-temperature conditions. Visual inspection of the pouch cell exterior (Figures 2a–d) revealed a clear difference: cells containing the liquid electrolyte exhibited noticeable swelling, while those containing the DES-ETPTA remained almost unchanged. However, visual inspection alone could not answer the quantitative questions:

  • At exactly what temperature or time point does gas evolution begin?
  • Is gas accumulation gradual or does it occur in discrete events?
  • What is the total volume change, and how large is the difference between the two electrolyte systems?
  • Can the safety improvement be expressed as a reproducible, instrument-verifiable number?

To answer these questions, the research team employed the IEST GVM2200 in-situ gas evolution monitor. Based on the Archimedes buoyancy principle, the instrument continuously recorded cell-volume changes and generated volume-time profiles. These measurements enabled a time-resolved comparison of the thermal responses of the two electrolyte systems.

The GVM2200 measurement results (Figure 2e) showed clearly that the liquid-electrolyte pouch cell exhibited a continuous increase in volume during high-temperature exposure, indicating ongoing gas generation. In contrast, the DES-ETPTA pouch cell maintained an almost constant volume throughout the test. These results provided quantitative, instrument-validated evidence that the DES-ETPTA electrolyte effectively suppresses thermal-induced gas evolution and cell swelling.

High-temperature pouch cell swelling comparison: liquid electrolyte vs DES-ETPTA solid polymer electrolyte

Figure 2. Comparison of high-temperature swelling behavior and volume change in pouch cells containing a liquid electrolyte or the DES-ETPTA electrolyte: (a–d) visual observation; (e) in-situ volume change curves measured using the IEST GVM2200.

5. IEST GVM2200: From Qualitative Swelling Observation to Quantitative Volume Change Data

IEST GVM2200 is an in-situ gassing volume monitoring instrument that measures cell-volume change in real time using the Archimedes buoyancy principle, providing continuous volume-versus-time curves with high-precision sensor output. The GVM2200 enables quantitative characterization of onset, rate, and accumulated volume of gassing-related changes under electrochemical cycling, thermal, or abuse test conditions.

IEST GVM2200 in-situ gas evolution volume monitoring instrument for pouch cell swelling and gas generation measurement

Figure 3. IEST GVM2200 in-situ gassing volume monitoring instrument based on Archimedes buoyancy principle, for real-time pouch cell volume measurement.

As demonstrated in the Xiamen University-Zhejiang University study, the GVM2200 supplemented visual observations of pouch-cell swelling with continuous quantitative volume measurements. Typical application scenarios include:

  • High-temperature storage: Monitoring the onset and rate of gassing-related volume changes during storage under controlled high-temperature conditions.
  • Overcharge testing: Real-time tracking of electrolyte decomposition and gas evolution under overcharge conditions.
  • Next-generation anode systems: Gas evolution characterization for silicon-based anodes (volume expansion + SEI gas), high-nickel cathodes (oxygen release), lithium metal batteries, and all-solid-state cells.
  • Electrolyte and additive system comparison: Side-by-side quantitative thermal stability evaluation of liquid electrolytes, solid polymer electrolytes, and semi-solid hybrid systems — as demonstrated in this AEM 2024 study.
  • Material-to-cell validation: In-situ evaluation of volume change from electrode material development stage through pouch cell verification, enabling early-stage safety screening.

Characterizing Gas Evolution in Your Solid Polymer Electrolyte or Battery Cell?

The IEST GVM2200 converts visual swelling observations into continuous, quantitative volume-time curves — providing the instrument-verifiable safety data required for publication-grade thermal stability comparisons across liquid, solid, and hybrid electrolyte systems.

Explore GVM2200 Specifications →

6. Summary

The AEM 2024 study from Xiamen University and Zhejiang University demonstrated the potential of DES-based solid polymer electrolytes for high-safety, high-voltage lithium metal batteries. The DES-ETPTA electrolyte system delivers simultaneous improvements in several key performance and safety attributes, including suppressed thermal gas evolution, stable lithium metal interfaces, reduced flammability, and compatibility with high-voltage LiCoO₂ cathodes operating up to 4.5 V.

The IEST GVM2200 provided the quantitative evidence for the thermal safety comparison in this study. By continuously monitoring cell-volume changes under high-temperature conditions, the system transformed the qualitative observation that “the DES-ETPTA cell exhibits minimal swelling” into quantitative volume–time data that clearly differentiated the solid-polymer electrolyte from the conventional liquid-electrolyte baseline. As solid polymer electrolyte research advances, performance differences between candidate materials are becoming increasingly subtle. Under these circumstances, quantitative and continuous in-situ volume monitoring becomes a primary characterization method.

7. FAQs

What is a deep eutectic solvent-based solid polymer electrolyte, and how does it differ from conventional solid polymer electrolytes?

A deep eutectic solvent (DES)-based solid polymer electrolyte incorporates a DES — a non-flammable eutectic mixture of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors — within a crosslinked polymer matrix such as ETPTA, rather than relying on dry polymer chains alone. The DES component provides ionic transport channels that improve conductivity compared to dry solid polymer electrolytes, while the polymer network maintains solid-state mechanical properties and suppresses lithium dendrite growth. In the DES-ETPTA system published in AEM 2024, this design simultaneously achieves high ionic conductivity, flame retardancy, and stable lithium metal interface performance — properties that are difficult to combine in conventional solid polymer electrolytes.

How does DES-ETPTA solid polymer electrolyte suppress gas evolution in lithium metal batteries?

Gas evolution in lithium metal battery pouch cells is primarily driven by thermal decomposition of the electrolyte at elevated temperatures, producing CO₂, hydrocarbons, and other gases that cause cell swelling. The DES-ETPTA solid polymer electrolyte suppresses gas evolution by replacing flammable carbonate-based liquid electrolytes with a non-volatile, thermally stable DES component encapsulated in a crosslinked ETPTA network. At high temperatures where conventional liquid electrolytes decompose and release gases, the DES-ETPTA system undergoes negligible thermal decomposition — as quantitatively demonstrated by near-zero volume change in IEST GVM2200 measurements, compared to progressive volume increase in liquid electrolyte cells under the same conditions.

What is in-situ gas evolution monitoring, and why is it necessary for evaluating solid polymer electrolyte thermal stability?

In-situ gas evolution monitoring is the continuous, real-time measurement of battery cell volume change during testing, providing quantitative data on gas generation onset time, accumulation rate, and total volume. It is necessary for solid polymer electrolyte thermal stability evaluation because the improvements offered by solid electrolytes over liquids can be subtle — particularly for advanced DES-based systems that show only partial, not complete, gas suppression. Visual observation can only confirm the presence of severe swelling; it cannot quantify gas evolution onset temperature, differentiate between electrolyte systems with similar but not identical thermal stability, or provide reproducible numerical data for publication. The IEST GVM2200 addresses this gap by recording Archimedes buoyancy-based volume change with continuous, high-resolution time resolution.

How does the IEST GVM2200 measure in-situ gas evolution in pouch cells?

The IEST GVM2200 measures pouch cell volume change in real time using the Archimedes buoyancy principle: the cell is submerged in a liquid medium, and high-precision force sensors continuously record the buoyancy force acting on the cell. As the cell generates gas and its volume increases, the buoyancy force changes proportionally — allowing the instrument to convert force measurements into continuous, high-resolution volume-versus-time curves. This approach requires no cell modification, operates non-destructively during thermal or cycling tests, and provides quantitative volume data from the earliest stages of gas evolution — including events too small to detect visually. In the AEM 2024 study, GVM2200 data provided the definitive numerical evidence comparing liquid electrolyte vs. DES-ETPTA solid polymer electrolyte thermal stability.

What types of battery safety tests is the IEST GVM2200 suitable for?

The IEST GVM2200 is suitable for any test protocol where battery or electrode cell volume change — whether from gas evolution, electrode expansion, or electrolyte swelling — is a relevant safety or performance indicator. Key applications include high-temperature storage and soak tests for pouch cell gas evolution onset characterization; overcharge abuse testing to monitor electrolyte decomposition-driven gas release; comparative thermal stability evaluation of different electrolyte formulations (liquid, gel polymer, solid polymer, DES-based); silicon anode volume expansion monitoring during cycling; and gas evolution characterization in all-solid-state cells, lithium metal batteries, and high-nickel cathode systems. The instrument provides continuous, non-destructive, real-time data across all these scenarios.

How does liquid electrolyte thermal stability compare to solid polymer electrolyte, and why does it matter for battery safety?

Conventional carbonate-based liquid electrolytes begin decomposing at temperatures between 60–80°C, releasing CO₂, CO, and flammable hydrocarbons that cause progressive pouch cell swelling and create internal pressure sufficient to rupture the cell casing. Solid polymer electrolytes — particularly DES-based systems — have substantially higher thermal decomposition thresholds and non-flammable compositions, resulting in negligible gas evolution under the same thermal conditions. This difference matters because high-temperature storage, fast charging, and thermal runaway events all expose battery cells to temperatures where liquid electrolyte decomposition becomes a primary failure driver. Quantifying the thermal stability gap between electrolyte systems using in-situ gas evolution monitoring (as in the AEM 2024 study) provides the objective, instrument-verified evidence needed to validate safety improvements in the design stage before full cell qualification testing.

Contact Us

If you are interested in our products and want to know more details, please leave a message here, we will reply you as soon as we can.

Contact Us

Please fill out the form below and we will contact you asap!

IEST Wechat QR code